Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 2:18-cv-00245 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00245, Dkt. No. 283
Decided
October 28, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) Motion for Summary Judgment Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 131.) The Court heard argument on this Motion at the pretrial conference held in the above -captioned case on O ctober 17, 2019. (Dkt. No. 263.) As announced at that hearing and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED.1 (Id. at 228:3–229:5.) I. Factual Background A.