Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 2:18-cv-00245 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2019)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00245, Dkt. No. 113
Decided
July 9, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER - Plaintiffs Objections (Dkt. No. 110) and Defendants Objections (Dkt. No. 109) are OVERRULED. The Claim Construction Memorandum and Order (Dkt. No. 100) is hereby adopted
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne for claim construction purposes only pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Magistrate Judge Payne’s Claim Construction Memorandum and Order (Dkt. No. 100) construed various terms from four U.S. Patents: No. 8,699,779, No. 8,977,571, No. 9,366,517, and No. 9,818,090. Plaintiff objects (Dkt. No.