Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fractus, S.A. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00135 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2019)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00135, Dkt. No. 693
Decided
September 30, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Intervenor-Defendant CommScope Technologies LLC ’s (“CommScope”) Motion in Limine No. 10. (Dkt. No. 562.) By its motion in limine, CommScope seeks to preclude Fractus “from referencing Defendants’ experts not called at trial.” (Id. at 8.) At a pre-trial conference held in this above-captioned group of consolidated cases, the Court granted the motion in limine to maintain its role as a gate- keeper and ordered supplemental briefing regarding w hether expert rep orts and expert testimony were admi…