Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fractus, S.A. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00135 (E.D. Tex. July 19, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00135, Dkt. No. 544
Decided
July 19, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- The parties in the consolidated cases are ORDERED to jointly appear at a status conference set for , at 1:30 p.m. in Marshall, Texas to explore the most appropriate trial sequence in light of this Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Intervenor-Defendant CommScope Technologies LLC’s (“CommScope”) Motion to Sever Claims Against CommScope and Stay Related Claims Against Carrier Defendants (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 231.) By its Motion, CommScope seeks to sever and try together in “a single, separate action” the claims asserted against it by Fractus, S.A. (“Fractus”) in this group of consolidated cases, and to stay the remaining claims in the consolidated cases. (Dkt. No.