Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fractus, S.A. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00135 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00135, Dkt. No. 273
Decided
April 16, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Length
67 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 183) filed by Plaintiff Fractus, S.A. (“Plaintiff” or “Fractus”). Also before the Court are the Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 211) filed by Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC , Sprint Communications Company, L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc., Nextel Operations, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile USA, Inc., and T-Mobile US, Inc., and Intervenor-Defendants CommScope Technologies LLC and CellMax Technol…