Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00718 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00718, Dkt. No. 553
Decided
February 11, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 539 MOTION Stay Enforcement and Waive of Appeal Bond or In Alternative a Reduced Bond filed by Traxcell Technologies, LLC, 550 Opposed MOTION Stay Enforcement and Waive of Appeal Bond or In Alternative a Reduced Bond fil…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are motions by Plaintiff Traxcell Technologies, LLC to Stay Enforcement and Waiver of Appeal Bond or in Alternative a Reduced Bond as to attorneys’ fees awards to Sprint1 (Dkt. No. 539) and to Verizon2 (Dkt. No. 550). Having considered the briefing, the Court DENIES both motions. I. Background On October 31, 2017, Plaintiff Traxcell Technologies, LLC filed its complaint, which alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,977,284 (the “’284 Patent”), 9,510,320 (the “’320 Patent”), 9,642,024 (the “’024 Patent ”), and U.S. Pat. No.