Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00718 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00718, Dkt. No. 471
Decided
April 15, 2020
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 399 Report and Recommendations, 445 Report and Recommendations, 444 Report and Recommendations,
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Traxcell’s objections to three Report and Recommendations: (1) Traxcell’s Objections to Order Granting Verizon’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of All Asserted Claims of the ’024 Patent (Docket No. 431); (2) Traxcell’s Objections to Report and Recommendation Gra nting Verizon’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of All Asserted Claims of the ’388 Patent (Docket No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case