Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00718 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 4, 2018)

Granted
Contentions
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00718, Dkt. No. 131
Decided
December 4, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff Traxcell filed its Motion for Leave to Serve Amended Infringement Contentions [Dkt. #92]. Consolidated Defendants Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Spectrum LP, and Sprint Solutions, Inc. (collectively “Sprint”) then filed their Response in Opposition [Dkt. #100]. The issue in dispute here is whether good cause is present for filing the Amended Infringement Contentions. After consideration, the Court concludes that Traxcell has shown sufficient good cause.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case