Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Oyster Optics, LLC v. Coriant America Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-01302 (E.D. Tex. June 21, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01302, Dkt. No. 615
Decided
June 21, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Coriant North America, LLC, Coriant Operations, Inc., Coriant (USA) Inc., Infinera Corporation, Alcatel -Lucent USA Inc., Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., and Huawei Technologies USA Inc. (collectively, “Defendants’”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Based on the Absence of “Phase Modulation” (Dkt. No. 262). 1 Also before the Court are Plaintiff Oyster Optics, LLC’s (“Plaintiff’s” or “Oyster’s”) Opposition (Dkt. No.