Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Oyster Optics, LLC v. Coriant America Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-01302 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01302, Dkt. No. 190
Decided
December 5, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 188 MOTION to Amend/Correct 174 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief MOTION TO MODIFY DATE FOR FINAL ELECTION OF ASSERTED CLAIMS filed by Oyster Optics, LLC
Length
67 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Oyster Optics LLC’s (“Plaintiff’s or “Oyster’s”) Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 157). Also before the Court are Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies USA Inc., Infinera Corporation, Coriant (USA) Inc., Coriant North America, LLC, Coriant Operations, Inc., and Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.’s (“Defendants’”) Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 165) and Plaintiffs’ reply (Dkt. No. 167).