Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Oyster Optics, LLC v. Coriant America Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-01302 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01302, Dkt. No. 162
Decided
September 22, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION denying as MOOT 161 Opposed MOTION to Stay PENDING DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TRANSFER BASED ON IMPROPER VENUE AND CONVENIENCE filed by Ciena Corporation
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Ciena Corporation’s (“Ciena”) Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Transfer Based on Improper Venue and Convenience (Dkt. No. 5) seeking dismissal for improper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) or, in the alternative, transfer to the Northern District of California for convenience under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Having considered the Parties’ submissions and the relevant authorities, the Court is of the opinion that Ciena’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue should be and is hereby DENIED.