Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Lamar Advertising Company et al, No. 2:16-cv-00374 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2017)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on February 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 162) recommending denial of Dkt. No. 92, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”). Plaintiff has not filed a timely objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Recommendation is ADOPTED. IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 92) is DENIED.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error