Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Lamar Advertising Company et al, No. 2:16-cv-00374 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Irvin International Inc. (“Irvin”)’s Motion to Sever and Stay (Dkt. No. 116) , to which Plaintiff Ultravision Technologies, LLC filed a R esponse in Opposition (Dkt. No. 122), Irvin filed a Reply (Dkt. No. 123) and Ultravision filed a Sur-Reply (Dkt. No. 134). I. BACKGROUND Ultravision filed its First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Dkt. No. 52) on June 28, 2016 and its Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (Dkt. No. 121) on September 2, 2016.