Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Lamar Advertising Company et al, No. 2:16-cv-00374 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 10, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00374, Dkt. No. 170
Decided
March 10, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 161 Report and Recommendations, 66 Motion to Dismiss, filed by The Lamar Company, L.L.C., Lamar Texas Limited Partnership, Lamar Media Corporation, Lamar Advertising Company
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on February 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 162) recommending that Lamar’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No. 91) be denied. Having considered Lamar’s objections and finding them to be without sufficient merit, and after a de novo review, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. IT IS ORDERED that Lamar’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 66) is DENIED.