Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00052, Dkt. No. 396
Decided
September 13, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 375 Report and Recommendations, 263 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc., Huaweis objections, 390 are OVERRULED
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Huawei objects to Judge Payne’s recommendation that T-Mobile’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of the ’339 patent under the doctrine of equivalents be granted. Having reviewed the objections, and having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) Huawei’s objections, Dkt. 390, are OVERRULED. (2) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 375, is ADOPTED.