Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 4, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00052, Dkt. No. 362
Decided
September 4, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 261 SEALED PATENT MOTION to Strike Arguments from the Nettleton Initial Report Regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,069,365 and 8,719,617 filed by T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court GRANTS-IN-PART T-Mobile’s Motion to Strike Arguments From The Nettleton Initial Report [Dkt. # 261]. Specifically, the Court GRANTS T-Mobile’s Motion as to Paragraph 479 of Dr. Nettleton’s report. The Court ORDERS that Huawei may not proffer testimony from Dr. Nettleton as to his inference that T-Mobile’s counsel advised it against enabling or testing IMS Restoration in its production networks. The Court otherwise DENIES the motion.