Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00052, Dkt. No. 196
Decided
April 15, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
39 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 2, 2017, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 8,069,365 (“the ’365 Patent”), 8,719,617 (“the ’617 Patent”), and 8,867,339 (“the ’339 Patent”) (collectively “the Asserted Patents). The Court has considered the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. Docket Nos. 126, 130, 131, 141, & 143.1 The Court has also considered the intrinsic evidence and made subsidiary factual findings about the extrinsic evidence.