Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01455 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 10, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01455, Dkt. No. 313
Decided
April 10, 2017
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - granting 291 Motion of Compel Compliance with Subpoena
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is plaintiff Allergan, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena, Dkt. No. 291, which seeks to compel third party Alcon Laboratories, Inc., to produce a set of previously identified documents .1 In its response, Alcon has opposed the motion but requested that, in the event the Court grants the motion, the Court also order that Allergan pay Alcon’s expenses regarding the subpoena , including attorney s’ fees. Allergan’s motion is GRANTED, and Alcon’s conditional cross-motion is DENIED without prejudice.