Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01455 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2017)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01455, Dkt. No. 252
Decided
January 12, 2017
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is M ylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Mylan Inc.’s Motion to Compel , Dkt. No. 210. The Mylan defendants (“Mylan”) ask the Court to order plaintiff Allergan, Inc., to produce a settlement agreement between Allergan and Apotex ( formally, Apotex Corp. and Apotex Inc.), one of the generic drug manufacturers initially sued by Allergan in this case. The Court GRANTS the motion to compel and directs that the agreement be produced on an Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only basis.