Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:15-cv-01455 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01455, Dkt. No. 284
Decided
February 28, 2017
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 271 SEALED PATENT MOTION TO AMEND THE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER IN CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-cv-0401 AS TO DEFENDANT FAMY CARE LIMITED ONLY. 283 MOTION for Hearing DEFENDANT FAMY CARE LIMITED'S MOTION FO…
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion to Amend the Stipulated Protective Order in Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-0401 as to Defendant Famy Care Limited Only , Dkt. No. 271, filed by defendant Famy Care Ltd. (“FCL” ). FCL requests that the Protective Order governing the consolidated case be amended in FCL’ s individual case to allow two non- attorneys to view material that the plaintiff Allergan, Inc., designated “Confidential.” FCL has also filed Defendant Famy Care Limited’s Motion for In-Person Hearing, Dkt. No.