Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Gonzalez v. InfoStream Group Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00906 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 26, 2016)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00906, Dkt. No. 185
Decided
April 26, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant New Life Ventures, Inc.’s (“NLV”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity ( “Mot.”, Dkt. No. 142). In its motion, NLV argues that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,873,665 (the “’665 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,558,807 (the “’807 Patent”) (collectively, the “Patents -in-Suit”) are invalid because they are ineligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Having reviewed the motions and the Patents -in-Suit, the Court is persuaded that none of the asserted claims are directed to patentable subject matter.