Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Gonzalez v. InfoStream Group Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00906 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2016)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00906, Dkt. No. 163
Decided
February 7, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion to Strike
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Emmanue l C. Gonzalez’s Motion to Exclude and/or Strike the Expert Report and Opinions of Da niel Manheim. (Dkt. N o. 118.) Gonzalez asks the Court to exclude Mr. Manheim’s testimony relating to (1) the eBay refere nces; (2) anticipation and obviousness; (3) subject matte r eligibility; and (4) Dr. Gar lick’s testimony. Gonzalez also asks the Court to strike Mr. Manheim’s testimony relating to (1) the level of ordinary skill in the art and (2) Mr. Gonzalez’s level of skill in the art. MOTION TO EXCLUDE I.