SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Mr. Mills filed by the Defendants Google Inc. , et al. (“Mot.,” Dkt. No. 202.) The Plaintiff opposes the motion . (“Resp.,” Dkt. No. 213.) For the reasons set forth below, the Defendants’ motion is GRANTED- IN-PART to the extent specified below and is otherwise DENIED. LEGAL STANDARDS “The admissibility of expert testimony is governed by the Federal Rules of Evidence and the principles laid out in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).” Virnetx, Inc. v.