Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00011, Dkt. No. 294
Decided
September 25, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Summar y Judgment Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 198) (“Mot.”) filed by Defendants Google Inc. and Youtube LLC (col lectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff SimpleAir, Inc. (“SimpleAir”) filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion (Dkt. No. 224) (“Resp.”).1 For at least the reasons stated below, the motion is DENIED. I. Background On January 8, 2014, SimpleAir filed suit agains t Defendants asserting claims of patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.