SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff SimpleAir, Inc.’s (SimpleAir) Motion to Strike or Otherwise Preclude Testimony from Defendants’ N on-Infringement Expert Dr. Stephen Wicker. ( “Mot.”, Dkt. No. 195.) Defendants Google, Inc. (“Google”) and YouTube, LLC (“YouTube” ) (collectively, “Defendants”) oppose the motion. (“Resp.” , Dkt. No. 221.) The Court heard argument on September 11, 2015. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.