Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Autozone, Inc.,, No. 2:13-cv-00888 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion fo r Reconsideration of Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order. Dkt. No. 172. The motion is DENIED. 1. The Court’s Claim Construction Order The Court issued a claim construction or der on December 23, 2014. One of the claim limitations for which the parties sought a claim construction was the limitation “in communication with an inventory management sy stem.” That limitation appeared in claim 1 and, in slightly different form, in claim 19.