Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Autozone, Inc.,, No. 2:13-cv-00888 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00888, Dkt. No. 162
Decided
December 23, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
38 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On November 19, 2014, the Court held a hearin g to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent N o. 7,054,830 (“the ’830 patent ”), owned by plaintiff Kroy IP Holdings, LLC. After considering the ar guments made by the parties in their claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 82, 85, and 91) a nd at the claim construc tion hearing, and with due consideration of the claim construction orders relating to the same patent in the related case of Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc., N o.