Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Autozone, Inc.,, No. 2:13-cv-00888 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 30, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two motions to supplement invalidity contentions in this case. The first was filed by d efendants AutoZone, Inc.; Panera Bread Company ; Men’s Wearhouse, Inc.; and Starbucks Corporation (collectively, the “AutoZone defendants”).1 Dkt. No. 104. The second was filed by defendant Hallmark Marketing Company, LLC . Dkt No. 118. Plaintiff Kroy IP Holdings, LLC, opposes both motions. Having c onsidered the parties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS both motions.