Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Freeny et al v Apple Inc, No. 2:13-cv-00361 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00361, Dkt. No. 128
Decided
October 1, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Vizio, Inc. Without Prejudice (Dkt. No. 120). The Court DENIES the motion. Defendant Vizio, Inc., opposes the motion to dismiss on the ground that it proposes that the dismissal be without prejudice. In Vizio’s view, any dismissal should be conditioned on the dismissal being with prejudice or upon the plaintiffs’ payment of Vizi o’s fees and expenses in this litigation.