Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Freeny et al v Apple Inc, No. 2:13-cv-00361 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00361, Dkt. No. 123
Decided
August 28, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The parties have submitted for the Court’s consideration their views as to the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 7,110,744 (“the ’744 patent”), owned jointly by the plaintiffs, Charles C. Freeny III, Bryan E. Freeny, and James P. Freeny. After considering the arguments made by the parties in the ir claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 99, 105, and 108), the Court issue s this Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order. I.