Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Freeny et al v Apple Inc, No. 2:13-cv-00361 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00361, Dkt. No. 109
Decided
July 22, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the defendants’ M otion to Stay Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review (Dkt. No. 92). The Court DENIES the motion without prejudice to the defendants’ right to refile the motion if and when the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) grants the petition for inter partes review filed by defendant Netgear , Inc.1 Vizio, Inc., t he other defendant who is still a party to this case, is not a party to Netgear’s petition for inter partes review.