Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, No. 2:12-cv-00832 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2014)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motions in Limine
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00832, Dkt. No. 395
Decided
December 13, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 275 Sealed Motion to Exclude
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Samsung’s Moti on for Leave to File a Motion to Exclude the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Ray Nettleton (Dkt. 275, the “Motion for Leave”). Samsung attaches the substantive Motion to Exclude (Dkt. 275-2, the “Motion to Exclude”). Samsung’s Motion for Leave is GRANTED. Samsung’s Motion to Exclude is DENIED, as the Court finds that Samsung had ad equate notice of the substance of Dr. Nettleton’s opinions. To the extent that Samsu ng’s objection is based on the premise that Dr.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case