Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, No. 2:12-cv-00832 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00832, Dkt. No. 380
Decided
November 7, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple’s Motion to Strike the Damages Report of MTEL’s Damages Expert, Walter Bratic (Dkt. 244, the “Motion”). APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the tr ier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and met hods; and (d) the expert has reli…