Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, No. 2:12-cv-00832 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00832, Dkt. No. 377
Decided
November 6, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Appl e’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of the ‘506 and ‘748 Patents (Dkt. 247, the “Motion”). LEGAL STANDARD Summary judgment should be granted “if th e movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Any evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986) (citing Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 158-59 (1970)).