TQP Development, LLC v. Intuit Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00180 (E.D. Tex. June 20, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment of patent invalidity filed by defendants Intuit Inc. and the Hertz Corporation (Dkt. No. 158), a motion for summary judgment of laches, filed by the Hertz Corporation (Dkt. No. 159), and a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement under the doctrine of divided infringement filed by defendants Intuit Inc. and the Hertz Corporation (Dkt. No. 160) . For the reasons set forth below, all three motions for summary judgment are DENIED. I. Invalidity A.