Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TQP Development, LLC v. Intuit Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00180 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 19, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00180, Dkt. No. 150
Decided
February 19, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Re: 117 Motion for Summary Judgment
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Intuit, Inc.’s and the Hertz Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 117). For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment of invalidity is DENIED. I. Background Plaintiff TQP asserts six claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 (“the ’730 patent) . Independent claim 1 recites as follows: 1.