Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TQP Development, LLC v. Intuit Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00180 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00180, Dkt. No. 152
Decided
February 21, 2014
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, denying 118 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Defendants Intuit Inc. and The Hertz Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement) filed by The Hertz Corporation. In addition, the stay previously ente…
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the parties’ responses (Dkt. Nos. 148 and 149) to the Court’s request for supplemental briefing (Dkt. No. 145 ). The Court sought supplemental briefs on one of the claim construction issues that arose in the course of proceedings on the defendant s’ motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. The claim construction issue in dispute relates to the limitation in independent claim 1 of TQP’s U.S. Patent No.