Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mondis Technology Ltd v. Chimei InnoLux Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00378 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 30, 2012)

Granted in Part
Damages Injunction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00378, Dkt. No. 46
Decided
April 30, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - all motions ruled upon as set forth herein
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Mondis Technology Ltd. (“Mondis”) and Defendants Chimei-Innolux Corp. and Innolux Corp. (collectively, “Innolux”) briefing regarding various issues related to supplemental damages and ongoing royalties. (Dkt. Nos. 20 -23, 31, 32, 35-38.) Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay Action in Light of Parallel International Trade Commission Investigation. (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case