Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mondis Technology Ltd v. Chimei InnoLux Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00378 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00378, Dkt. No. 11
Decided
September 30, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The Court GRANTS-in-part and DENIES-in-part Mondiss motion. The Court awards Mondis damages for its 2011 supplemental sales that were not considered by the jury. The Court sets the ongoing royalty rate for mon…
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Mondis Technology, Ltd.‟s (“Mondis ”) motion for supplemental damages for 2011 sales and for an ongoing royalty rate. (Dkt. No. 1.) 1 The Court GRANTS-in-part and DENIES-in-part Mondis‟s motion. The Court awards Mondis $1,971,810 in damages for its 2011 supplemental sales that were not co nsidered by the jury. The Court sets the ongoing royalty rate for monitors at 1.50% and the ongoing rate for televisions at 0.75%. The following pages outline the Court‟s reasoning. II.