Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mondis Technology Ltd v. Chimei InnoLux Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00378 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00378, Dkt. No. 25
Decided
February 27, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - the court DENIES the motion
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Chimei InnoLux Corp. and InnoLux Corp. (collectively “InnoLux”) Motion to Reconsider Order Regarding Mondis’ Motion for Supplemental Damages and an Ongoing Royalty (Dkt. No. 13.) Having considered the parties’ written submissions and the arguments of counsel, the Court DENIES the motion. I. Background Mondis Technology Ltd. (“Mondis”) filed this patent infringement case on December 31, 2007. On June 27, 2011, the jury entered a verdict in favor of Mondis, awarding $15,000,000 in damages for past infringement.