Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lodsys, LLC v. Brother International Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00090 (E.D. Tex. June 14, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00090, Dkt. No. 689
Decided
June 14, 2013
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim constru…
Length
102 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court are Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 555), Defendants’ Response Brief (Dkt. No. 578), Kaspersky Lab’s Response Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 590-1), and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (Dkt. No. 591). The Court held a hearing on April 30, 2012. i Table of Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1 A.