Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lodsys, LLC v. Brother International Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00090 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00090, Dkt. No. 573
Decided
March 12, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC ’s (“Samsung”) Motion for Clarification Regarding Submission of Expert Declarations (Dkt. No. 531.) Samsung seeks clarification of Rule 4 -3 of the Rules of Practice for Patent Cases before the Eastern District of Texas (“Patent Rules”) regarding its disclosure obligations under Patent Rule 4-3(b).