Lodsys, LLC v. Brother International Corporation et al, No. 2:11-cv-00090 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are: (1) Defendant Ca non U.S.A., Inc.’s (“Canon”) Motion for Partial Dismissal Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 42); (2) Defendant Lexmark International, Inc.’s (“Lexmark”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 44); (3) Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd’s, Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s, and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 96); and (4) Defendant Hewlett -Packard Company’s (“HP”) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Sever and Transfer Venue.