GeoTag Inc v. Frontier Communications Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00265 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement for Customer Defendants with Fully -Hosted Locators Provided by Third Party (Dkt. No. 1111) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of No Direct Infringement of Claims 1 and 31 and Their Asserted Dependent Claims (Dkt. No. 1107). The Court held a hearing on these motions on November 8, 2013. For the reasons outlined below, the Court finds that these motions should be and hereby are DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff GeoTag, Inc. (“GeoTag”) owns United States Patent No.