Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GeoTag Inc v. Frontier Communications Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00265 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 15, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00265, Dkt. No. 214
Decided
September 15, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons discussed above, Solfos motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 52) and motion to transfer venue (Dkt. No. 71) are DENIED
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court are Defendant Solfo, Inc’s (“SOLFO”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue (Dkt. No. 52) and motion to transfer venue (Dkt. No. 71). In its motion to dismiss, Solfo argues that it is not subject to personal jurisdiction in this Court and asks the Court to dismiss all claims against it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) for improper venue.