GeoTag Inc v. Frontier Communications Corp et al, No. 2:10-cv-00265 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2013)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court are Plaintiff GeoTag, In c.’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 354), Defendants’ response (Dkt. No. 361), and Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 365). Also before the Court are: Defendant Canon U.S.A., Inc.’s (“Canon’s”) Supplemental Markman Brief (Dkt. No. 383) and Plaintiff’s response (Dkt. No. 399); and a letter brief filed by the “WMA Defendants,” 1 arguing that certain claims of the patent-in-suit are indefinite (Dkt. No. 401), and Plaintiff’s response (Dkt. No. 404). The Court held a hearing on February 12, 2013.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error