Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Packless Metal Hose, Inc. v. Extek Energy Equipment (Zhejiang) Co Ltd et al, No. 2:09-cv-00265 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2013)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00265, Dkt. No. 135
Decided
February 22, 2013
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Extek Energy Equipment (ZHEJIANG) Co. Ltd.’s (“Extek”) Motion for Summary Judgment, filed November 9, 2012 (Dkt. No. 81). Extek moves for summary judgment of non-infringement of United States Patents Nos. 5,409,057 (“the ’057 Patent”) and 5,551,504 (“the ’504 Patent”). The C ourt having considered the same finds that summary judgment of non-infringement should be GRANTED for the reasons set forth below. I. Background and the Patents-in-Suit Plaintiff Packless Metal Hose, Inc.