Packless Metal Hose, Inc. v. Extek Energy Equipment (Zhejiang) Co Ltd et al, No. 2:09-cv-00265 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2011)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court are Defendant Extek‟s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 11) and Plaintiff Packless Metal Hose, Inc.‟s Motion for Sanctions. (Dkt. No. 30.) The Court h as carefully considered the parties‟ motions and respective arguments and for the following reasons DENIES Defendant Extek‟s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and CARRIES Plaintiff Packless Metal Hose, Inc.‟s Motion for Sanctions. II. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff Packless Metal Hose, Inc.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error