Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. Internet Brands, Inc. f/k/a CarsDirect.com et al, No. 2:08-cv-00313 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00313, Dkt. No. 371
Decided
October 9, 2012
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying post-trial motions
Length
46 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are five post-trial motions filed by the plaintiffs and one filed by the defendants: (1) Versata’s Motion to Alter or Amend Final Judgment Under Rule 59(e) (Dkt. No. 349); (2) Versata’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity and Infringement (Dkt. No. 350); (3) Versata’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, New Trial on Autodata’s Breach of Contract Claim Due to Lack of Injury (Dkt. No.