Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. Internet Brands, Inc. f/k/a CarsDirect.com et al, No. 2:08-cv-00313 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00313, Dkt. No. 60
Decided
September 30, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motions to dismiss and to transfer venue
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the defendants Internet Brands, Inc.’s (“Internet Brands”) and Autodata Solutions Company’s and Autodata Solu tions Inc.’s (collectively “Autodata”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 19) and motion to transf er venue (Dkt. No. 44). The Court, having considered the motions and the arguments of counsel, hereby DENIES the motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) & 12(b)(3) and DENIES the motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).